News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 $600m Port Kembla harbour project hits snag 

$600m Port Kembla harbour project hits snag

04 Jun, 2010 03:21 PM
Wollongong City Council is concerned existing road and rail infrastructure may not be adequate to support the $600 million expansion of Port Kembla's outer harbour.

In a submission on the Port Kembla Port Corporation's plans to reclaim 52ha of the port for seven new berths, the council's general manager David Farmer said the proposal was "supported in principle as it brings with it a host of social and economic benefits".

But he also flagged the need for further studies into traffic issues, safety, water pollution, the effect on native wildlife and visual impacts.

  • VOTE: Does the region need better road and rail infrastructure to support an expansion of Port Kembla Harbour?

    The NSW Department of Planning received 18 submissions on the proposed expansion during six weeks of public consultation that closed earlier this month.

    A Port Kembla Port Corporation spokeswoman said responses were being prepared for the Department of Planning on issues raised in the submissions, but it was too early to comment on specific issues.

    Mr Farmer's letter noted concerns that the region's road network would reach capacity sooner than expected and the port corporation needed to commit to undertake necessary road upgrades, rather than the council.

    He was concerned about potential negative impacts on Appin Rd and Picton Rd, including road safety, and said the application had not addressed the impact on either road.

    The council also suggested the use of uncrushed blast furnace slag and coal wash would contribute to water pollution.

    Further studies would be needed to examine the development's impact on native wildlife, Mr Farmer said.

    The council disagreed with the environmental assessment's claim that the area "does not provide shelter, breeding areas or habitat" for wildlife, indicating three endangered and two vulnerable species had been recorded in the area.

    "An eastern quoll has been recorded within the proposed development," Mr Farmer wrote.

    "There are also records of sooty oystercatcher within the proposed development area."

    Migratory birds including the endangered black-necked stork and little tern, the vulnerable black-tailed godwit, and the white tern and little shearwater occasionally foraged along the shore. Dugongs and fur seals had been seen in the outer harbour.

  • Print
    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size

    comments


    Date: Newest first | Oldest first
    Thank you for keeping a level head on this Mr Farmer, and not bowing to political and corporate pressure.
    Posted by WTF!, 4/06/2010 6:51:57 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
    well, we all knew that the road structure was inadequate, and as for rail - what about that Stanwell Park viaduct where trains still have to slow down to pass - and one at a time. Increasing berths before getting the infrastructure right is another case of the cart before the horse.
    Posted by Fergie, 4/06/2010 8:32:50 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
    forget about all the fauna, what about all the people who will be endangered by all the extra traffic on our roads if this goes ahead? It seems a sooty oyster-catcher gets more thought, than the humans nowadays, sheeesh!
    Posted by Mike Hunt, 4/06/2010 8:34:20 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
    Geez, everyone wants wollongong to keep up with the times, yet they will always put a hurdle in the way of expansion. Slag and Coal wash what, many estates near water have been created utilising these materials just look at Haywards Bay, and the Woonona estate behing Holy Spirit College, and they're worries about pollution.
    Posted by Geez, 4/06/2010 8:40:39 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
    This is why we need the Maldon-Dombarton rail line started now ,not in three years.
    Posted by Markm, 4/06/2010 8:52:37 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
    We need the Maldon-Dombarton rail line.
    Posted by Burda, 4/06/2010 9:39:02 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
    Wollongong City Council has been actively engaged in attracting industry/business opportunities to this region, even employing a special person to be involved in this Councils aim. Yet when the opportunity is pesented they are more worried about a couple of birds, and lo and behold "an eastern quoll' probably lost. This is a heavily industrialised area and to hold up approval because of this is stupidity. Next we will have someone dig up a midden finding a few shells left over from someones meal 100 or 1000 years ago, who cares, but it will surely hold up this project and benefit to this region. I understand the concern of insufficient road capacity and that should be raised together with the State and Federal Governments for grants, loans etc. It is not the Port Authorities responsiblity to build and maintain road infrastructure that belongs to the three tiers of Government.
    Posted by johne, 4/06/2010 9:50:36 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
    These are the things Member for Wollongong should be concentrating on, not worrying about the opening up of the mall. Where was she when the Port Corp had the presentation. Also Paul McLeay the so called Ports Minister,he should have put in an appearence. Oh I forgot, there were no cameras present. No milage there.
    Posted by the observer, 4/06/2010 10:51:03 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
    There is NO benefit for Wollongong or the Illawarra in this, as the companies that use this port have engaged in "rationalisation' of their workforce and the slim pickings left over for the gong turns into locals doing part time work whilst rubbing shoulders with people from QLD, NZ, Korea etc. Build a Port at Rose Bay.....at least the locals up their get the immediate benefits. The slag at the furnaces is irrelevant in this debate as the size or capabilities of the port will not determine or change the pollution levels of the steelworks, the slag goes ahead regardless of the ports wishes.
    Posted by smoker, 4/06/2010 5:43:25 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
    The law requires the environment and indigenous heritage be considered through assessments and the planning process. johne should have some respect for the law and indigenous heritage -the comments are ignorant. Preserving heritage is of value to society. I agree with the infrastructure comments except the development should contribute to fund upgrades needed to cope with additional traffic -iuts illogical that ratepayers and taxpayer fund the full upgrade.
    Posted by crax, 4/06/2010 6:25:40 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
    1 | 2  |  next >

    post a comment


    Screen name  *
    Email address  *
    Remember me?
    Comment  *
     
    We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
    Wollongong City Council believes major issues including infrastructure need to be addressed before Port Kembla is expanded.
    Wollongong City Council believes major issues including infrastructure need to be addressed before Port Kembla is expanded.

    Most popular articles




    Illawarra Mercury







    Weather brought to you by:

    Weatherzone

    Classifieds

    Front Page

    Current Issue
    Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
     SEND...
     SAVE...
     SHARE...