News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Brutal budget for Wollongong 

Brutal budget for Wollongong

18/04/2008 3:00:22 AM
Wollongong residents have been warned to expect service cuts, council job losses, new fees and charges and extensive delays to all major projects as part of a new five-year plan revealed by general manager David Farmer yesterday.

If endorsed by administrators on Wednesday, the five-year budget plan will be put on exhibition and will come into effect mid-year.

The slash-and-burn budget outlines major cost savings and comes on top of a 2008-09 rate rise of 5.7 per cent, or a $50 increase for the average bill.

This year, the council is aiming to reduce its projected deficit of $15 million to $4.4 million.

By 2013, Mr Farmer hopes to see a surplus of $2.4 million.

The community will feel the pain as the plan is executed.

Mr Farmer did not rule out further rate hikes above those pegged by the State Government, but said at this stage they were not being factored into the plan.

Instead Mr Farmer wants to introduce fees for paying rates by credit card, increased caravan park charges, cuts to child care, community groups and internal staff programs, scaled-back environmental programs, cancellation of leases to community groups, sale of public land, sponsorship cuts and reduced New Year's Eve funding.



Mr Farmer said this was only part of the solution.

In an effort to shave $61 million from capital works, projects including the West Dapto transport link, Blue Mile proposal, Southern Gateway project, Thirroul Community Centre, Crown St Mall refurbishments and others had all been reviewed and had their completion dates pushed back.

In some cases they had been delayed indefinitely.

"This (budget) represents the level to which the projects can be funded from estimated (developer) contributions and grants (together with) general revenue," the report says.

In a frank assessment the administrators, in their preface to the budget papers, have described the parlous state of the council's finances.

In effect they have distanced themselves from policies adopted by the sacked council and signalled their determination to put in place new measures aimed at turning finances around.

"To immediately do all of those things previously planned would worsen the overall financial deficit already confronting us. It would require the council to incur further debt by raising substantial loans that would inevitably be a burden to all ratepayers," administrators Robert McGregor, Gabrielle Kibble and Col Gellatly said in a joint statement.

"This draft plan concentrates on maintaining and improving the core services that are delivered by council to its community."

Mr Farmer's aim is to make the council debt-free by 2011, when Wollongong is due to elect a new group of councillors.

"Ultimately, we can only do what we can afford," Mr Farmer said yesterday.

He said he had been bombarded with letters from ratepayers complaining about crumbling roads, parks and other infrastructure, and believed this was where the council's money was best spent.

"I get more letters about deteriorating infrastructure ... than I get about any other matter."



Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well done David Farmer!

While I do not agree with all the proposals put forward, for the first time in many years I feel we have a person running council who is genuinely interested in the city and region and has a vision linked to fiscal responsibility.

Posted by P O'Brien on 18/04/2008 5:18:48 PM
David Farmer,It takes a brave person to forcast such budget constrains such announced today.

If you belive it, go for it.

Posted by Budget for Wollongong on 18/04/2008 5:42:49 PM
I don't agree with rate rises. Wollongong was used and abused by council staff, start to slash some of their fringe benefits. Why should the puplic suffer for badly run council. If David Farmer is serious about bringing in a surplus of $2.4 million he should start asking for some warranty on the dodgy work carried out by contractors and other maintenance workers.
Posted by Tim on 18/04/2008 7:19:51 PM
The previous councillors always had an eye of their re-election and often voted in favour or against motions before council based on that -not on what the planning laws said or what was financially responsible. If we were married to someone who drove us into debt to the tune of $17 million and still wanted to keep spending to remain popular, it would drive us to bankruptcy and divorce. This is what popularly elected councils deliver us - gross debt, shallow populist decision-making not in our best interests, but based on their personal interest in being re-elected. Good on Farmer for biting the bullet.
Posted by Barbara on 18/04/2008 7:33:44 PM
As a ratepayer I will feel the pain of extra rates and the loss of some of these plans for which we had no funding. However, it has to be done. Many of these very expensive pet projects of previous councillors were driving the council to financial ruin. I do not believe any individual former councillors were an exception from this. They all had their particular constituencies, and would milk the council purse as hard as they could to cater to them. This is what "democracy" brings us in Wollongong. I congratulate Farmer and the administrators for having financial sense.
Posted by Congratulations on 18/04/2008 7:37:43 PM
Memo to those naive locals, the wannabe failed councillors from previous elections who think a quick election is their only chance of getting on council and ambitious hacks with their eye on their own political career - Farmer's financial rescue plan will take until 2013 to work. Just ponder on this - if you get your way and the administators go and we have council elections in 2009, how much of Farmer's work to get our Council budget back in the black will be trashed? Once we again have local councillors, we will again have small-minded partisan politics, playing favourites with funding for irresponsible schemes based on their best chance of reelection, not on the overall health of the community. I say let Farmer get on with this plan and let the administrators work their entire 4.5 year term, as this is the only way we have a hope of working our way out of this deficit and irresponsible, populist spending ideas foisted on us by elected councillors.
Posted by I support Farmer and Adminstrators on 18/04/2008 7:43:54 PM
If the council budget is as brutal as is being claimed here, it is wholly attributable to the actions and inactions of our previously elected councillors. Not only the ones named by ICAC, but ALL sacked councillors. The locals calling for democracy to be restored and fresh council elections for 2009 do not give a toss about the welfare of the ratepayers because as soon as an elected council is in place, the financial mismanagement, rorting, and special pleading projects designed to shore up their electoral popularity will reign again. Getting this financial rescue plan to fruition in 2013 is one of the best arguments for retaining the administrators for their full terms, as Farmer's plan will be derailed the minute elected councillors are back.
Posted by Mari on 18/04/2008 8:25:05 PM
If we had elected councillors in place, Farmer's rescue plan for our entire local government region would be tossed out. The sooner the elected councillors are back, the sooner the gross financial mismanagement of ratepayers' money will return. The councillors cannot help themselves, as they pour multimillions of our money meant for infrastructure into their pet projects. The outrageous amount poured into the loss-making Illawarra Heritage Museum for the past 24 years by the council is just one of many examples where dinky little local interest groups are able to reroute ratepayers' money from roads and infrastructure into their hobbies, without anyone asking them to account for their non-performance in 24 years. These pet projects, sinkholes and other rorts will never be dealt with by elected councillors as they are focused on retaining their elected seat, not on responsible management of our funds.
Posted by Elected Councillors would gut this plan on 18/04/2008 8:30:51 PM
Once again, Dapto gets shafted.
Posted by Richard Harrison on 18/04/2008 10:39:57 PM
Regrettable though it is, I agree with the general manager and three Administrators that WCC should reduce its $14 million debt, and any money available should be spent on crumbling infrastructure.

However, I am concerned about the cancellation of the West Dapto Transport Link. It is easy to be wise in hindsight, but the link should have been in place before the housing development was approved.

Posted by Fergie on 18/04/2008 11:08:16 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
General manager David Farmer wants Wollongong City Council back in the black by 2012.
General manager David Farmer wants Wollongong City Council back in the black by 2012.
The forecast
The forecast

MOST POPULAR

06 Jul 09 | The one thing each NRL coach knows with absolute certainty at the start of each season is that a game of rugby league goes for 80 minutes, writes Glen Humphries.
Butler HR
 
TIGS
 
HEALTH EXPO HOUSE AD
 
Illawarra Mercury Drive
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...