News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Council administrators to remain until 2012 

Council administrators to remain until 2012

28 Sep, 2009 04:00 AM
Love them or hate them, the Wollongong City Council administrators are here to stay - until 2012 anyway.

Local Government Minister Barbara Perry has confirmed the length of their term under intense questioning during budget estimates in Parliament, saying the city was "not ready" for democracy.

Opposition and Greens MPs peppered Ms Perry with questions about their performance and again stoked the fire of the debate: how long should they stay?

Greens MLC Sylvia Hale told the hearing residents felt the administrators were not in town often enough and "rarely visit".

"From my talking to residents of Wollongong I know that they are deeply unhappy and feel that the community has in effect been excluded from the decision-making process down there," she said.

Ms Perry strongly rejected this and declined a request from Ms Hale to give details of the time the administrators spend in Wollongong, saying she does "not require that of each of the individual 1500 councillors in this state".

"I know that the administrators conduct face-to-face meetings; not only do they have people come in to see them but they actually go out to the community," Ms Perry said. "If you have a look at the council reports that are put out on the council website you will see that they are reflective of the work that has been done.

"When they are required to be there they are there, but it depends on the issues and the circumstances."

The previous councillors were not full-time employees. The amount of work they did outside official duties was up to them.

Each administrator's salary for the 2008-09 financial year was $83,200 - a total cost of $249,600 to the council. This compares to $370,000 for a mayor and 12 councillors.

Ms Perry also addressed the need to ensure a prohibition on binding caucus votes in relation to development applications, a corruption prevention recommendation of the Independent Commission Against Corruption.

She said Wollongong's new "code of conduct already sets out that binding caucus votes are inappropriate where merit-based decisions are required".

Ms Perry said she believed the administrators had good support in Wollongong and were still addressing matters raised by ICAC.

"It takes time to rebuild and it also takes time to address the cultural issues within an organisation," she said." Until I am told otherwise, the council will stay in administration until September 2012."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Considering Ms Barbara Perry's reluctence to answer specific questions about the Administrators at Wollongong City Council it would seem that the Labor stronghold in Sussex Street is very worried and so they should be. They have taken our democratic rights away here in Wollongong, in what is supposedly a democratic country. When governments override the will of the people then there is something critically wrong with the system. The power must always be with the people who elect their government and that government is there because of the will of the people. Labor has forgotten that simple principle and it is now a dictatorship and all efforts must be made to reverse this trend. The problem is we have a dictator in sheeps clothing at the head of the Federal system and he is supporting the State in its lunacy and there is no viable alternative, frightening times ahead I think.
Posted by Johne, 28/09/2009 9:47:35 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Lets just call it what it is, an attempt by the Labor party to ensure there is only an election for councillors when they hope the community has forgotten about the past. Any election held soon would be likely to deliver NO Labor candidates to the council, not palatable for Sussex street…..
Posted by fisho, 28/09/2009 11:09:01 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Gee whiz, Liberal party apologists are a bunch of conspiracy theorists. So now we are supposed to believe that a State Labor government (backed by a Federal Labor leader) sacked a local Labor council in order to make sure we had no democratic rights? Yeah right, sure they did. A fat lot of good it was when we had democratically elected councillors - corruption thrived under their watch. And it's not just in Labor council areas - Liberal and Independent controlled councils are just as bad at local government level - which is why the government sacked incompetent councils of all political persuasions over the past decade (look it up) Some naive people seem to think that only Labor party local councillors are a problem - talk about a one sided view. I seriously doubt that most people in Wollongong care whether we have elected councillors or not as long as things get done. The administrators for Wollongong and Shellharbour councils are doing just fine - let them get on with it. As I understand it, if you don't like the way the government is handling things then you can vote against them in the elections - THAT is democracy. Despite what some would tell you it's alive & well in NSW
Posted by Truestory, 28/09/2009 11:55:25 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Truestory, 28/09/2009 11:55:25 AM, I'm sure the people of Wollongong would love to exercise a bit of local democracy, unfortunately the NSW State Labor Government has decided we are unworthy to have a go until 2012, what are they afraid of. Alive and well did you say……..
Posted by fisho, 28/09/2009 2:24:57 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
I don't understand why we the citizens of Wollongong "are not ready for Democracy yet"? I've committed no crime or corrupt act? Those that were committing those corrupt actions were removed. I'm intelligent enough to exercise my democratic powers at the ballot box, why punish an entire city when there were no more than a dozen of its citizens at fault? This is Australia, not some Eastern Bloc Communist Republic, restore Democracy in the Illawarra immediately!
Posted by Jim, 28/09/2009 2:46:17 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
I must agree with statement that : "We have democratically elected dictatorship"
Posted by Barry, 28/09/2009 3:23:30 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
Hmmmm, up here in Helensburgh the 'unelected' council wants to change the zoning laws...what do they care about the local history or environment when they have the chance to increase state coffers?.......what an absolute disgrace. How different then are we to communist countries like China or Burma?
Posted by Gus, 28/09/2009 11:33:29 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
I think the only raised matters from ICAC that the Wollongong ratepayers wish to see addressed are when are ALL the proven corrupt going to be prosecuted and what sentences will they have?
Posted by Alan Bond, 29/09/2009 7:06:26 AM, on Illawarra Mercury

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...