News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Government blasts BlueScope over carbon claims 

Government blasts BlueScope over carbon claims

03 Apr, 2009 10:01 AM
BlueScope Steel has been accused of overestimating the impact of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme on its business.

Unions and a federal MP expressed disappointment yesterday at the company's decision to publicly declare that the scheme (CPRS) in its existing form would put the Port Kembla steelworks at risk.

  • Carbon scheme jeopardises Port Kembla steelworks: Bluescope

    Previously the steel manufacturer had talked in general terms about the scheme's possible impact but chief executive Noel Cornish pulled no punches before a Senate select committee in Wollongong, saying if the business became unviable: "Port Kembla steelworks is threatened".

    Throsby MP Jennie George said BlueScope was "conflating the impact of the economic downturn and our proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme".

    "I was most concerned to hear about the presentation ... because it didn't portray the full picture about our proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme and the high level negotiations that are occurring ... to address some of the legitimate concerns of BlueScope Steel."

    Ms George said she thought the presentation had been mischievous. She added the Government was aware of the impact of the financial crisis on steel demand but said the scheme was a separate issue.

    "Before the downturn, in our discussions (with BlueScope) there was not the doomsday suggestions about the scheme there are now," Ms George said.

    "I want to place on the record the company has met with me and (Cunningham MP) Sharon Bird on numerous occasions - the Government is aware of the issues and is working on addressing them."

    BlueScope said its presentation had been straight down the line.

  • "The company is in no way being mischievous," a spokesman said.

    "We have presented at yesterday's Senate hearing a genuine analysis of what we expect the impact of the CPRS, in its current proposed form, would be on our business.

    "The point was made yesterday that CPRS costs of this magnitude would be difficult to bear in good economic times. In the current downturn, they would be disastrous."

    The spokesman said BlueScope had been "appreciative ... and encouraged by the support we have received from our local MPs".

    "They, like BlueScope, are keen to secure our region's economic prosperity, however the CPRS as it is currently designed is flawed and will require significant amendment," he said.

    Parliamentary Secretary for Climate Change Greg Combet entered the fray yesterday, promising the Government was in "ongoing" talks with BlueScope.

    "Port Kembla integrated steelmaking will receive permits at the 90 per cent rate of assistance, which is the maximum level of government assistance under the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme," he said.

    But BlueScope argues the free permits would actually only cover 64 per cent of its emissions.

    Ms George said she understood this concern and an independent committee was looking into the claim.

    National secretary of the Australian Workers' Union Paul Howes said the union was working to ensure a result that also protected jobs.

    As negotiations were still continuing, Mr Howes believes "it is still too early to say what the result of the CPRS will be on Port Kembla direct".

    EDITORIALDon't shoot messenger: Page 26

    Print
    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size

    comments


    Date: Newest first | Oldest first
    This is a responsible approach by BlueScope and hard to understand MP Jennie George calling them "mischevious". BlueScope must act in the best interests of their shareholders and the many thousands of local direct and indirect employees. Personally, I'd rather see them invest $1 billion locally in the co-generation plant rather than have to keep this money "up their sleeve" to try and combat what would be a terrible competitive situation (given that China etc won't have such hinderances).
    Posted by BJ, 3/04/2009 11:21:18 AM
    Whilst BlueScope's attitude may seem to be seen as an overestimation, as BJ correctly states, the one thing that needs to be factored in is the major state of play of imported steels into the country that are much cheaper to purchase. With the Carbon Reduction Scheme, obviously, steelmaking costs in this country will increase to such a level, that will then be passed on in the sale price to customers. Will customers be that 'wedded' to Australian made because it's better for the environment, than something that is made with little or no environmental controls and bought at a much cheaper price (and sold at much higher margins to end users). As usual, there is more to this story than meets the eye. Perhaps the government needs to ensure that there are heavy tariffs put on imported steel to ensure it is not cheaper and seen as a more cost effective solution at the expense of australian steel - and JOBS.
    Posted by be fair, 3/04/2009 3:21:58 PM

    post a comment


    Screen name  *
    Email address  *
    Remember me?
    Comment  *
     
    We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
    BlueScope Steel has claimed the Government's proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme would threaten the Port Kembla steelworks.
    BlueScope Steel has claimed the Government's proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme would threaten the Port Kembla steelworks.
    Related Coverage
    ARTICLES
    DOCUMENTS

    Most popular articles


    Cool Blue Air Conditioning Pty Ltd
     


    Illawarra Mercury







    Weather brought to you by:

    Weatherzone

    Classifieds

    Front Page

    Current Issue
    Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
     SEND...
     SAVE...
     SHARE...