News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 How bid to save Port stack fell over 

How bid to save Port stack fell over

27 Nov, 2008 03:00 AM
The Port Kembla Port Corporation had offered to buy the smelter site and gauge community sentiment about preserving the iconic stack, it was revealed yesterday.

But negotiations between the port corporation and smelter owners Port Kembla Copper broke down over the sale price.

The 21ha site backs onto Darcy Rd - only a stone's throw from the port's outer harbour, which has been earmarked for a $600 million expansion.

"We have definitely expressed an interest and it's fair to say the site fits in under the major projects the NSW Government is considering (for the outer harbour)," port corporation CEO Dom Figliomeni told the Mercury yesterday.

As well as price, another stumbling block was understood to be the perceived future risks associated with the site, despite the fact it had been remediated to the satisfaction of environmental authorities.

"Given the historic use of the site there will always be some residual risk," Mr Figliomeni said.

He said keeping the stack may have been an option under the original proposal to buy the smelter site.

"When we first looked at the site, part of our proposal was to effectively consider it on the basis that the community would want the stack to remain in situ.

"We were looking at keeping it in the context of what the stack meant to the community because we didn't adopt a for-or-against view in relation to the stack.

"However, it is their site and they can do with it as they please," he said.

Port Kembla Copper general manager Ian Wilson said: "Our shareholders have a very strong commitment to the future and recognise there are potential liabilities associated with this site and the way they can exercise their existing rights is to place, if necessary, caveats and restrictions on what the site can be used for.

"We think a port-related redevelopment would be appropriate for the site, appropriate for the community and consistent with government projections and targets. Our company recognises the port corporation may have a significant interest in the site and it is quite happy to discuss the issue as the timing becomes appropriate," Mr Wilson said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
To all the folk who have been bleating about turning the old stack into a tourist or cultural or heritage attraction, you might like to sensibly ponder the following points.

1. How much would the site cost to buy for a potential operator?

2. How much would it cost to carry out all the remedial works needed to just bring the site up to legislative construction, health & safety standards?

3. How much would it cost to then "flash up & fit out" the site to make it an attractive proposition for anybody to want to visit?

4. How much would it cost in ongoing maintenance to ensure the site continues to meet all legislative construction, health & safety standards into the future?

5. How many ongoing jobs would this type of operation generate?

6. Considering the gravity of the potential expenses, how much would an operator have to charge in fees to people who want to use the service on offer & would the level of these charges be enough for an investor to recover costs within an appropriate period and make it a viable proposition for tourists to visit? This is prime industrial land and our local State, Federal & Council representatives & chambers of commerce & industry should be busting a gut to attract private investor capital (not spend taxpayer / ratepayer money) to develop the property into a long-term enterprise that will create meaningful jobs & attract ongoing investment and income to the region.

Wollongong has enough lame-duck art & heritage attractions that employ minimal people, attract minimal income & simply do not justify their existence & would be dead in the water without taxpayer funded assistance.

This city needs to aggressively encourage appropriate income generating development in these sorts of available industrial areas not muck about with bungy jumping or arty ideas. Spare a thought for the many unemployed people in the Port Kembla & what appropriate industrial development will do in regards to creating jobs & bringing cold-hard-cash into Port Kembla.

Posted by Ross, 27/11/2008 7:34:35 AM
I almost shed a tear to hear the old stack has to go.

It is an icon for the area but the bureaucrats will win the day as it is a potential risk.

I guess it is irony that the stack has become more dangerous in death than it was when alive.

Posted by JJ, 27/11/2008 9:24:48 AM
It was built in our lifetime.

Let's be responsible and remove it in our lifetime, rather than leave the decision to those that follow.

Posted by DM, 27/11/2008 2:04:20 PM
For anyone to believe that unemployed people from Pt Kembla will get employment from another industry on this site is naive.

These industries have continually exploited this region and left it to rot while they count the cash.

A handful of people will receive full-time work and the rest will be employed on a part-time or casual basis without holidays, sickies or superannuation.

The people who are employed full-time will not generally come from the Illawarra let alone Port Kembla.

The only local winners in this area will be the people who supply part-time workers to the sites while skimming some of their meagre hourly rate for themselves.

The future for Pt Kembla is not knocking down the stack and starting another heavy industry.

It would be best (in the long term at least) to close all the heavy industries in this area and resume the land for holiday units on the harbour, an airport, a marina, a casino...etc.

We already had and still have industry here and it does not assist or support the community, all it has done is make tourists avoid the area like the plague.

Some people just refuse to wake up and smell the coffee; Wollongong is a beautiful place being sacrificed to fill the pockets of the mostly foreign shareholders of trans-national companies.

Some of you must be still living in the old days if you think a big new industry at Pt Kembla means jobs for the unemployed of Pt Kembla.

Keep the stack and lose the rest.

Posted by local dole bludger, 27/11/2008 3:58:19 PM
I guess us locals can no longer use the term "born in the shadow of the stack".
Posted by Jodie, 27/11/2008 5:16:52 PM
If one puts forward a suggestion or supports and particular view it is not "bleating".

Ross raises valid questions and could have done so without being rather rude. Let's find the answers to those questions by all means. I see nothing wrong with a society trying to retain parts of its heritage, industry is surely part of Port Kembla's.

Posted by Paddy, 28/11/2008 5:50:07 AM
I find that the Stack is of historic significance to the region/state and that it will cause more problems with the surroundings while/after it is being destroyed than it did while it was still opperational. not to mention that with the destruction of the Stack will cause its own pollution that will linger just as long as when it was working, but also while the stack will be destroyed it will do damage to the school which is also another historic significant structure in/for the area.
Posted by BJ, 1/12/2008 2:58:27 PM
get rid of the stack and replace it with something good to look at
Posted by g.l, 2/12/2008 2:25:18 PM
The "Friends of the BIG DIDGE " will never surrender to the forces of ignorance & division.

Our voice will be heardlong & loud in the archives of the big HISTORY BOOK. Those that peddle ignorance & division , & especially those that seek to supress the voices of clarity ,art & light can explain to our children , & our children's children why Port Kembla & this region does not have a glorious 'BIG DIDGE "promoting national reconciliation , INTERNATIONAL TOURISM , A CLEAN & SUSTAINABLE HOSPITALITY & ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY - do you "EINSTEINS " think that the Illawarra is not "pretty enough ", or that we actually can't find the $10-20 million to fix the concrete cancer , & secure major employment & economic & cultural growth into the 21 st Century , & beyond !!?? Let's face this nation's past with honesty , not fear , coz when we walk through the fear , there is a breakthrough - GENIUS !!!

The following generations will kindly thank us for liberating their imaginations , & setting ALL OUR SPIRITS FREE !!! VIVA THE GLORIOUS BIG DIDGE @ PK ! Sincerely , Romeo Tatangelo . I challenge the enlightened Editorial staff @"THE ILLAWARRA MERCURY " to print this comment in the newspaper ,as well as my other 3 comments sent to you website last week. Let's open up this critical community dialogue , & let's give the true voice of this community the opportunity to respond .

Is this not what our troops are overseas fighting for right NOW ?? freedom of speech & freedom of ideas , & freedom of communication . Let's see a fairgo in this RIDGY DIDGE dialogue of ideas .Sincerely , Romeo Tatangelo

Posted by Romeo Tatangelo, 4/12/2008 8:09:16 AM
The STACK must stay its part of Port Kembla History. I am not from Port Kembla myself but I love comming to Port Kembla when i live in Campbelltown the STACK MUST STAY.
Posted by MASO, 14/12/2008 7:09:16 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Wollongong resident Kathy McCarthy, in this photo taken by husband Michael in 1987, had a rare view of the Illawarra when ER&S gave some employees an opportunity to climb the stack.
Wollongong resident Kathy McCarthy, in this photo taken by husband Michael in 1987, had a rare view of the Illawarra when ER&S gave some employees an opportunity to climb the stack.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles




Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...