News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Marsh responds to `anti-gay' furore 

Marsh responds to `anti-gay' furore

27/11/2008 3:17:00 PM
Illawarra father Warwick Marsh, who was sacked as a men's health ambassador this morning over claims of anti-gay views, responds in an open letter:

``It is a wonderful thing when people vilify you and tell lies about you. Certain journalists have claimed that I am homophobic. You be the judge.

Is being homophobic bringing a young man into your home with your young family who has the death sentence of AIDS? That same young man needed shelter from the storm. A placed filled with unconditional love. He came from a broken home. He had a father wound. He had been sexually abused by other older men. That same young man ended up working the wall in Sydney. This is not a good place for any young man to have to work. He needed someone to tell him that he was loved and appreciated not for the sex he could give to his paying customers who abused him but because of who he was on the inside a wonderful young man, with a future and a destiny.

Is being homophobic giving an award at a public function in Parliament House, Canberra in August 2005 to a wonderful Lesbian women from Melbourne who had the guts to set up an organization to help trafficked women caught in the exploitative web of male driven prostitution. Unfortunately some men still are bastards? Certainly not all but some. White Ribbon Day tells the stories.

Is being homophobic inviting a Mayor of a local council in Sydney to give awards to the men who have completed a fatherhood course? That mayor was a homosexual man but as a Lord Mayor he deserves our respect and honour. After all we are all someone's daughter or someone's son and as such we all deserve that same honour and respect.

If I am attacked it is because I believe that our children matter. If I am attacked it is because I believe that we should give our children the very best we can give them. If I am attacked it is because I believe every child has the right to a mother and a father. Children need a mother and a father not two mummies or two daddies.

The document in question is public information and is available for free download at www.gendermatters.org.au. 21 Reasons Why Gender Matters has 34 different authors and contributors. Some contributed a lot and some a little. Ten are doctors while many are practitioners and counsellors. Several had experienced the gender wound first hand so they are well able to write with both authority and compassion.

21 Reasons Why Gender Matters shows from thousands of studies the world over, that the natural way is the best way and when we break that natural order the statistics show things just start to go wrong. People get hurt. Children are abused. Father wounds are created. Families break up. Relationships break down. Maybe we should rename the 'Father Wound' the 'Gender Wound'? The pain of the Gender Wound is a non-discriminatory pain. This pain is felt by heterosexuals and homosexuals. The story of this pain is well told in the ground breaking Australian movie called the Men's Group.

21 Reasons Why Gender Matter was released some time ago in terms of the news cycle. This document is old news. Every Member of Parliament received a copy in the lead up to the last election. So did the media in the press gallery. Why all the fuss now?

I don't know where this story came from? I have not said anything about this subject for quite some time. This sort of heterophobia baffles me.

A lady from the US in the lead up to international Mens Day www.internationalmensday.com on November 19 called me a ``father's rights advocate''. I would prefer to be called a ``love advocate'' or a ``new way to be human advocate''.

My main focus is healing the father wound in the children of Australia and trying to turn the tide of fatherlessness in our nation. Suicide is directly related to fatherlessness. Our children need live fathers not dead fathers. Men are dying almost five years earlier than women. Most of this morbidity is preventable. Men's health has been a much neglected issue. The women of Australia were granted a National Women's Health Policy in 1989. This National Men's Health Policy has been a long time coming.

I applaud Nicola Roxon for her initiative in getting this policy off the ground. She is a great women and mother and she is doing a great job. I congratulate the Rudd Labor Government for their courage to tackle the shocking epidemic of male suicide and I am willing to continue as an advocate for Aussie men as an ambassador on their behalf as well as the government. We desperately need a national discourse on a National Men's Health Policy. I am honoured to work alongside such great Aussie men as Professor John MacDonald, Barry Williams, Tim Mathieson and others. All have a story to tell. They need to be heard.

It is sad that these vicious unprovoked personal attacks are obfuscating the real message of Men's Health and the many slurs that men still have to endure because of their sex.

I have received many encouraging phone calls and emails in the light of these unprovoked attacks upon my character and I want to thank those Australian men and women for their support and encouragement.

Warwick Marsh,

Fatherhood Foundation

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Warwick Marsh still doesn't get it even though he protests he isn't homophobic.

He says "the natural way is the best way and when we break that natural order the statistics show things just start to go wrong".

What is the ''unnatural'' that he is talking about?

Relationships break down, that's natural.

Marsh simply doesn't believe homosexuality is natural or as good as being heterosexual and that is homophobia.

He says he has compassion for gay people but it is always in another context like being ill.

But a Health Ambassador needs not just to be tolerant of homosexuality but supportive and nurturing of men's sexuality what ever it is.

Posted by EricG on 27/11/2008 5:48:50 PM
Keep up the good work Warwick..
Posted by Leeanne on 27/11/2008 11:28:58 PM
It says something about the paucity of rational argument against Marsh's position, that his opponents have to deliberately mis-characterise it as "homoPHOBIA".

It is not, and never has been, a "phobia" to believe that something is wrong.

It isn't a phobia to believe that drunkeness is wrong. It isn't a phobia to believe that greed is wrong. It isn't a phobia to believe that adultery is wrong.

Nor, therefore, is it an "irrational fear" to hold the belief that homosexual activity is morally wrong.

Disagree with Marsh all you like, but don't lie about his motivation. Peter

Posted by Farmer Pete. on 28/11/2008 8:48:27 AM
Ha! If for nothing else, Warwick's incomprehensible, rambling writing should rule him out for a position like this.
Posted by Alan on 28/11/2008 8:57:04 AM
Homosexual behaviour has been observed in 1500 animal species - so it's "natural" just like any other part of nature.

Homosexuality is neither morally right nor wrong. It is simply an amoral act. It has no positive moral implications or negative moral implications.

It is simply an act between two consensual partners of the same sex. Its morality is no different than that of the sex act between two consenting partners of the opposite sex.

Posted by Pewit on 28/11/2008 10:29:49 AM
You can't change the internationally recognised definition of phobia: Oxford dictionary - phobia is "fear or aversion". Likewise it is well recognised that homophobia includes the belief that homosexuality is morally wrong as well as the belief that homosexuals are inferior to heterosexuals.
Posted by EricG on 28/11/2008 10:56:45 AM
This comment by Pewit has merit: Homosexuality is neither morally right nor wrong. It is simply an amoral act. It has no positive moral implications or negative moral implications.

It is simply an act between two consensual partners of the same sex. Its morality is no different than that of the sex act between two consenting partners of the opposite sex. The problem arises today when we try to harass and change the meaning of social institutions such as marriage.

Leave it in the bedroom.

Posted by Moderate on 28/11/2008 4:59:56 PM
I don't believe that homosexuals are inferior to heterosexuals but I do believe homosexuality is morally wrong.

Am I a homophobe?

By the way, I must disagree with the term "homophobia". It is simply barbaric to unite a Latin and a Greek word to form a neologism.

Posted by Xavier on 28/11/2008 6:44:17 PM
The terminating of Warrick Marsh's position was a knee jerk reaction, by Ms Roxin.

If she bothered to read the article in question, she would find each statement made about same sex relationships was based on factual research.

I'd like to see Pewit reference his alleged 1500 species, and the definition of "homosexual behaviour".

The fact from the document Warrick was "sacked" over is that less than 3% of human beings practice same sex relationships. So, it is not a natural occurance, as it's nowhere near the average needed to make it such.

Homo = human, therefore no other species can "practice homosexual behaviour" the fact that someone here tries to align homophopia with an "aversion" to "homosexuality" would make 97% of the population homophobic.

Posted by Rossco on 29/11/2008 7:30:54 AM
Good on you Warwick. There is no one I would rather have representing myself and my sons as a Health Ambassador.
Posted by Tim on 29/11/2008 4:35:30 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

6/01/2009 | My younger sister told me over Christmas about the time my mother decided to try topless sunbathing. My mother had hit her 40s - about the same age I am now.
D & D Services
 
South Coast Trucks
 
Butler and Pollock
 
TIGS
 
Illawarra Mercury Drive
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...