News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Port Kembla Coal Terminal strikes roll on 

Port Kembla Coal Terminal strikes roll on

10 Feb, 2012 03:00 AM
Crippling stoppages will continue at Port Kembla Coal Terminal after management and the workers’ union again failed to reach an agreement in their industrial dispute.

About 100 workers walked off the job for a second time yesterday, just one day after returning to work, at the start of 48-hour protected action.

Rolling stoppages, scheduled to continue until February 19, are believed to have effectively shut down the coal terminal with a flow-on effect to some of the region’s coalmines.

The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union yesterday said the latest offer from the coal terminal (PKCT) was worse than the deal previously on the table.

‘‘We will continue with this industrial action that has been advised to the company and then after that is finalised we will review our position,’’ mining and energy district vice-president Bob Timbs said.

He could not rule out further industrial action if the dispute was not settled.

‘‘Future industrial action is definitely open to us,’’ he said.

PKCT management had previously attacked the union over its first seven-day strike, which it said threatened the terminal’s reputation with domestic and international customers.

Terminal general manager Peter Green could not be reached for comment yesterday.

Mr Timbs claimed the latest offer again attacked job security provisions, which have been one of the main sticking points in negotiations so far.

‘‘Basically they are still trying to erode the coverage of the enterprise agreement,’’ he said.

PKCT has said some of the CFMEU’s requests were not consistent with industry practice, including the requirement that middle-management employees be covered under the agreement.

Mr Timbs said the union wanted to ensure all existing positions remained covered.

He also said terminal employees understood the ‘‘seriousness of the attack on their employment’’.

BHP Billiton manages the coal terminal for a consortium of coal producers including Peabody Energy, Gujarat NRE and several others.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I am wondering whether this is a Union dispute with the company or the employees with the company. From what I understand the employees want a 4.5% pay increase and the Company offered 4.2% & if this strike is about the difference then there is gross stupidity from both the employees & Union. If an employee earned $1000 per week and got 4.5% increase he would then get $1045 p/w or if 4.2% were accepted then the new pay would be $1042. We are argueing over $3 p/w X 52 = $156 per year X 3 = $468 over the life of a 3 year agreement, but have now lost $7000 in pay up to now, is that smart?
Posted by johne, 10/02/2012 6:58:54 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
How are these guys allowed to hold a company and associated industries involved to the shipping process to ransom because they can't get what they want? Surely this on going strike affects alot more people then the 100 workers on strike. If you don't like your working conditions or pay rate then find another job, don't bring the town's biggest source of revenue to a stand still. Perhaps the coal terminal needs Alan Joyce from Qantas in charge.
Posted by How, 10/02/2012 7:40:18 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Stick together workers, BHP will conspire to destroy your jobs
Posted by bargy, 10/02/2012 8:23:32 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Up until 16 years ago the Coal Terminal experienced regular industrial turmoil. A new general manager arrived who sat down with the workforce and their union and together they developed a new work methodology involving self directed work teams that delivered massive efficiences. Shortly after when throughput shrank, the workforce proposed a 7.2%wage cut to steer the Terminal through the downturn. The employees have an enviable strike free record over the last 16 years. It would seem the current Management team wants to return the work model to the traditional 1960's 'staff - wages' system.
Posted by micka, 10/02/2012 9:09:56 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Micka sounds like an old union PR person. How much do these blokes get paid today for this fantastic efficiency? No strike probably means they were getting what they wanted and now that the business won't just cave in they go straight to strike.
Posted by Gong, 10/02/2012 1:39:50 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
Micka is correct i think, 16 yrs without a strike. Now mgmt want individual contracts, need to draw the line somewhere.
Posted by bargy, 10/02/2012 4:06:51 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
People are loosing jobs and these guys want more
Posted by DD, 10/02/2012 4:35:50 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
It doesn't look like management is asking for individual contracts. It looks like union is pushing its own agenda and trying to increase its coverage. This dispute sounds like its about the union increasing its own power & very little to do with the actual employees. These guys are attacking their own employment to further the union. What does an employee get from union coverage of management roles probably not even covered by an award
Posted by Gong, 10/02/2012 5:00:59 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
Why a 4.5% increase when the CPI is running at 2.5%/ Greedy, and reason why workers are being laid off and companies are going broke. When will these dinosaurs of unions wake up to the realities of our economy and get with the times.
Posted by Dave, 10/02/2012 7:02:55 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
Sack them all, re-hire new staff who actually want to do some work, instead of the usual leaching by unions trying to suck every bit of money they can out of their employers, while getting a few days off. Makes reducing the workforce as much as possible very attractive.
Posted by ABC, 10/02/2012 11:45:03 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
25 January, 2012

Most popular articles




Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...