News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Sandon Point land plan blasted 

Sandon Point land plan blasted

23 May, 2009 04:00 AM
Sandon Point activists have slammed a Wollongong City Council plan to spend $1.8 million to buy two parcels of land from developer Stockland, claiming it is a waste of money.

Council officers have proposed the council buy a beachside site at the northern end of the Sandon Point Reserve for $1.52 million, dedicating the site as community land. The site had been valued at $2.7 million.

Another smaller site, known as the "pathway land", would be acquired for $315,000.

Meantime, Stockland would not be required to pay the council for land set aside for an extension to Wrexham Rd, south of Thomas Gibson Park at Thirroul.

The recommendations will be voted on by administrators at Tuesday's council meeting.

A Stockland spokeswoman said yesterday the company would continue to work with the council on the issue but did not want to pre-empt its decision.

But the Northern Illawarra Residents' Action Group (NIRAG) is angry the council intends to pay for the sites, while Stockland will retain land at the end of Hill St, which is declared an "Aboriginal place" under the National Parks and Wildlife Act.

The group's publicity officer Jill Merrin said there was no new justification for handing ratepayers' money to Stockland.

"The land is zoned for public recreation and should be gifted back to the public," she said.

Former independent councillor Alice Cartan said more than $4 million was initially set aside to purchase the sites - before legal advice last year that the land should be dedicated to council for free.

"If they have got away with buying what was proposed for $4 million for under $2 million, then that's great," Ms Cartan said.

"But I am concerned whether that other land (Hill St) will be protected from future development."

NIRAG president Alex Peterson said the proposal would give Stockland the "golden key" for development at Wrexham Rd and is concerned over council's claim it is unsuitable as public open space.

Sandon Point campaigner Jill Walker labelled the deal a "scam", saying that the Hill St site would not be sufficiently protected in the hands of Stockland.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Council should not even pay 1 dollar of ratepayers money for this. Whatever happen about all this concern in the media about places eventually going under sea levels along the coast through climate change? What makes areas of Sandon Point an exception from this in the future? That must be considered by Council. Is that $4 million of ratepayers money still set aside? Wouldn't that help Council spending on infrastructure? If legal advice said it should be free, what has changed? This nonsense has gone on too long over Sandon Point. This is the last green area in the Gong LGA that goes to the coast that can be seen from the rim of the Illawarra Escarpment. I would suggest the administrators go and have a look.
Posted by Alan Bond, 23/05/2009 8:34:25 AM
Retain land for free? I wonder if I put in a request for a little piece of the reserve at the back of my block if council would be willing to donate that to me?
Posted by Manny, 23/05/2009 9:23:52 AM
I wholeheartedly agree with NIRAG's contention that Stockland should donate this land to the community.

They have profited handsomely from their purchase of the land at Sandon Point, want further land given to them at Wrexham Rd to make further profits but want to charge ratepayers for a small parcel of land for use for public recreation.

What a tight-fisted approach by a corporate giant that believes - from past dealings with WCC that they can walk over local needs and extract more money from this region.

Keep up the good work, as we really need NIRAG to protect this beautiful part of the coast.

Posted by Spots, 10/06/2009 4:49:40 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Jill Merrin (left), Alex Peterson and Jill Walker at Sandon Point. They are unhappy about council's purchase plans. Picture: ROBERT PEET
Jill Merrin (left), Alex Peterson and Jill Walker at Sandon Point. They are unhappy about council's purchase plans. Picture: ROBERT PEET

Most popular articles




Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...