News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Secret plans for harbour 

Secret plans for harbour

15 Mar, 2008 03:00 AM
Wollongong Harbour can look picture-postcard perfect.

But the first steps have already been taken behind closed doors to give the city's harbour precinct a makeover that could go well beyond simple cosmetic surgery.

Firmly in the NSW Government's sights is a new look that will turn the harbour into a tourist hub with all the trappings of the 21st century - shops, cafes and restaurants - to complement a nearby marina serving a mixture of recreational and commercial craft.

Just how grand a plan remains a mystery. Minister for Lands Tony Kelly remains tight-lipped.

The minister is considering expressions of interest from six applicants keen to promote their concept for the area, which takes in the Continental Pool, Flagstaff Hill and Brighton Beach.

Those concepts could be anything from a million-dollar facelift to a billion-dollar redevelopment.

The extent to which the harbour could be transformed is revealed in the Department of Lands' expressions of interest document, which lists seven separate precincts.

They include a commercial area and a large plaza on the northern side of Belmore Basin, with commercial and marine retail space, restructured moorings where the fishing fleet is now berthed and what appears to be a northern extension of the harbour itself past the Continental Pool, including reclaimed land and floating jetties.

Among the most controversial aspects is Flagstaff Hill, which is earmarked for a visitors centre and potentially a larger commercial or tourist development on the reserve itself.

Former lord mayor Alex Darling told the Mercury in the days before Wollongong City Council's sacking, that it was "time to attack Flagstaff Hill and attack the harbour".

His opinion the area was "crying out for development" helped to revive rumours of Macquarie Bank's possible interest in a marina development at the harbour.

Mr Kelly said in Parliament last week the six submissions would be assessed over coming weeks, with a view to developing a short list of applicants, who would then be invited to submit detailed proposals.

An evaluation panel of four people - a probity officer, two Department of Lands staff and one senior Wollongong City Council officer - would review the expressions of interest and make a recommendation to the Department of Lands for approval.

Once a preferred tenderer was selected the proposal would then be placed on public exhibition, as part of the planning approval process.

The Belmore Basin site would be leased to a private consortium or business and money collected given to Wollongong City Council.

A spokesman for Mr Kelly said it was standard business practice to conduct an expressions-of-interest process in-confidence.

The entire process would be overseen by an independent probity adviser, he said.

"As the sites in question are all Crown land, any decisions regarding their future will ultimately rest with me," Mr Kelly said.

Belmore Basin is said to anchor the Blue Mile strip and Wollongong City Council endorsed a $1.8 million revitalisation package for the area last October.

However, while the NSW Government is moving forward with its harbour plans, the future of the $48 million Blue Mile master plan for Wollongong is less clear.

When asked this week if the Blue Mile was under a cloud, the council's general manager David Farmer said there was a need to review all council's projects.

"We've got a very large schedule of projects and I'll need to run everything by the administrators and look at our financial capacity to be able to deliver those projects," Mr Farmer said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I thought the reason ex-mayor Alex Darling and others flew to Queensland was to view the seafront promenade and developments that occured there under David Farmer's tenure.

There was also talk Farmer was actively recruited for the Wollongong council general manager's job precisely because of his experience doing this.

Darling's regret on being sacked was his inability to influence the direction of this Blue Mile project.

Well, we have got rid of Darling and anyone remaining is on notice - we do not want your vision imposed on Belmore Basin, we do not want fancy cafes and yacht moorings.

Posted by Belmore basin for locals, not blow ins, 15/03/2008 7:10:17 PM
I thought Wollongong council didn't have any money.

Where is this money all coming for the Blue Mile?

Our roads need repairing, schools, buses, and hospitals, are the important things.

They're wasting my hard earned taxes on rubbish.

Posted by pijeon, 16/03/2008 11:11:36 PM
I am strongly opposed to the proposed "devlopment" of our beach area.

The idea of multi-storey buildings for tourists etc is only a continuation of the multi-storey "development" of apartments or offices etc in other parts of Wollongong.

Surely one look at the high rise "development" in Sydney and Brisbane should be enough to say no to similar development in Wollongong.

The beach area happens to be our heritage, and we have an obligation to keep it as it is for future generations.


Posted by Nifty, 16/03/2008 11:33:42 PM
We had our boat in Wollongong harbour for several years.

After experiencing far too many easterly storms and very little shelter in the harbour and the rampant vandalism which has left very poor memories of the area, most definetly improvements have to be made so that people can once again want to come to Wollongong.

Posted by devoogd, 18/03/2008 1:01:21 PM
Is this another chance for some dodgy developer to get in there and make millions while yet another one of Wollongong's jewels is ruined?

It's not as if we have that many jewels left. One of this area's greatest assets, apart from its people, is its natural beauty.

Leave Wollongong Harbour alone. Leave what is left of our wetlands alone. Leave our escarpment and coastline alone.

People want to visit this area because of its natural beauty, not because we have the same developments and congested roads they have.

I am not alone. There are thousands of us.

Posted by citizen of a corroded city, 19/03/2008 7:31:19 PM
Fix the walking tracks, stabilise and beautify the cliff areas, put the kids playground back, weed, keep grass mowed and have regular rubbish collections. Put a few more seats of massive proportions in positions of beauty. Forget the millionaires' yachts, forget the marina which will lock our population out and forget the expensive restaurants and eateries, where you have to shell out a hundred or more for a seat with a view. When will people like ex-lord mayor Darling realise most of us want simplicity, natural beauty and cheap access to these lovely spots.
Posted by Brad Walsh, 21/03/2008 4:16:01 PM
I too am strongly opposed to any development of these areas. We want our beaches ''natural''. Leave your metal over extension crap, plant holders, sculptures (I'm an artist so I say this with some sense of the sublime), jingle jangles, wanna be a big time Brisbane mini me's and bad eateries with sad excuses for coffee out of it. Take note: the seagulls are already angry!!! As will we be if proposed developments go ahead. Our city is already rather shameful and already a national embarrassment (let me count the ways) ... LEAVE THE RARE JEWELS TO SHIMMER STILL!!!!
Posted by Leave your bad taste nic nacs off our place!!!, 23/03/2008 8:45:40 AM
I am disgusted at the proposal to develop what is already a beautiful harbour. I am from the UK and it is really disappointing to see how Australia is ''developing'' for the worst. Why ruin a historic, SCENIC landscape with the hideous ugliness of this sickly 21st century fashion. NEW is NOT better. Why is the UK so pretty? Simple. We protect our heritage. What heritage is Australia protecting?? Why create an ugly American style existence? Keep Australia Australian. Tourists come to Australia to see untouched beautiful landscapes, wild beaches and the true Ozzie culture. Not to be overwhelmed with ugly high-rises, shopping complexes and the synthetic look that is all too the ''Gold Coast/Miami look''. Why is it happening? To make those filthy rich government officials even richer. I'm a structural engineer and would never allow myself to work on a project I didn't approve of. STOP DESTRYOING AUSTRALIA! By the way, I'm a sporty 32 year old - in case you think this way of thinking is ''old fashioned''. Let's stop destroying what's beautiful in life.
Posted by Hayley, 24/03/2008 9:23:28 PM
Preserve Australia's diminishing natural coastal beauty by resisting unnecessary building development on it.

This harbour gives the town culture and heritage, something that should be preserved by a society with any brains. Think about the rewards of preservation in years to come if you care for the future generations.

Preservation will retain the great quality of lifestyle that you may possibly take for granted.

Gradual development like this will destroy it slowly without you knowing.


Posted by Matt, 25/03/2008 6:53:17 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...