News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Shops start food fight with Wollongong council 

Shops start food fight with Wollongong council

11 Mar, 2010 03:00 AM
More than 50 food business owners in Wollongong's CBD have signed a petition objecting to hefty health inspection fees that have cost some operators around $1000 in just over six months.

Wollongong coffee shop customer Peter Campbell instigated the petition and has collected 52 signatures from almost every cafe, pub and restaurant in the city centre. He said all but 10 he approached had signed it, and those who hadn't did oppose the fees but feared retribution from the council.

The signatures range from sole traders to managers of upmarket restaurants and franchises.

Cafe Burelli owner Terry Liu was charged $390 for an inspection last May, $100 to reinspect the premises in June and another $394 for his next half-yearly inspection in December.

If a second inspection had been needed after the December check, he said the annual bill would have been just shy of $1000 - at least five times more than the $100 to $180 he used to pay for a once-a-year inspection prior to the introduction of tougher state laws in 2008.

"It is just me and my wife running this small business," he said. "We would need to sell around 330 extra cappuccinos to recover that."

Mr Liu said the $250 administration fee and $140 inspection fee were excessive when the inspectors spent less than three minutes checking his cafe.

"When they come in, it's like they're looking for any small problem so they have to come back and charge another $100," he said.

A council spokeswoman said about 70 inspections were conducted each week and only 10 written submissions on the fees had been received since October 2008.

She said the fees were consistent with those recommended by the NSW Food Authority to allow the council to cover the cost of the expanded inspection program. The council has no plans to review the fees at present.

Mr Campbell said the fees were outrageous and businesses that paid taxes and higher council rates were being "double taxed".

"It is a big rip-off and a big con," he said.

"For them to charge to inspect these premises is akin to paying for a police search warrant on your home. These new regulations are just bureaucracy gone crazy."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Parking meter rip offs, restaurant inspections in the city centre rip offs, the highest property rates rip offs and the list goes on. I believe that these businesses have a genuine reason for complaint as there are hundreds of food outlets, Clubs, Pubs, food manufacturers, butcher shops etc that do not get a regular inspection.

Also, to have one standard charge for this type of inspection is grossly unfair as some premises would take more that three minutes to inspect. Ask Council how many QUALIFIED Inspectors they have employed, I say only ONE. How can only one person inspect all of the premises covered by WCC area, mission impossible.

Posted by johne, 11/03/2010 5:14:45 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
These fees are unfortunate and unfair. These small business owners need to focus their petition on the NSW Food Authority as well as council.
Posted by frook, 11/03/2010 5:43:06 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
I have pointed out on other occasions. What councils do is what ratepayers let them do. You used to have councillors who were unresponsive to ratepayer input and for the most part people just put the issues in the too hard basket. Now you have an administrator and are whinging about excessive charges. Take back the political power and tell government do what we need or get out. Wollongong has a small community group trying to re establish the correct relationship between government and those it serves but it won’t happen if ratepayers are only concerned when poor government becomes personal. This abuse of power is a state-wide issue yet there is no state wide rebellion. There's your problem! Edward James Umina activist
Posted by Edward James, 11/03/2010 8:39:57 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
The Mercury has to be kidding here. You would be the first ones with screaming headliines if customers were made sick or even died from filthy shop conditions. The Mercury's owners ran a long term campaign in the Sydney Morning Herald specifically for the right to 'name and shame' food outlets that breached public safety food laws. And won! The public have a right to know what local food outlets fail to meet food handing laws. Instead of running a sympathetic story about the cost burden on food outlet owners whose businesses need to be re-examined - because they FAILED the food inspection - you would be doing a far greater service tothe public and your readers by detailing precisely what were the failures detected by the Council food inspectors in the first place and running stories alertinhg us all to the identity of food outlets who fail inspections. I for one want to know if there are rats or cockroaches running around. or their faeces are in the kitchen or if other food handling laws are being breached. One you inform the readers exactly what the so called minor breaches are, then we can form an opinion ourselves as to whether the food inspectors werepetty - or not.
Posted by Defending Council inspectors, 11/03/2010 9:03:19 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Looks that it pays to have no problems that inspectors could pick on.
Posted by Barry, 11/03/2010 9:32:17 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
This is not a critiscism of the Council Food Inspector, (Defending Council inspectors) he does a fantastic job, my point is that there should, no, must be more of them to ensure that the community is as safe as possible from catching a disease from dirty and unhygenic premises. The critiscism is the amount of money being charged by Council for this service, the general concensus amongst business owners is that it is excessive for the amount of time that it takes to do an inspection and I believe that most fair minded persons would also agree that it is excessive. I want to see every food outlet of every description to be inspected at least twice a year and I believe that Council has that responsibility but is not anywhere near the mark in carrying out that responsibility and that is not the fault of dedicated staff working at Council but the Administrators and the General Manager.
Posted by johne, 11/03/2010 12:43:23 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
It is tens millions dollars business behind this across NSW. It has happened in this lucky, democratic society. It's a big scam.
Posted by Shameful, 11/03/2010 12:58:55 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
At these prices there charging I think the Council should have at least 6 Food Inspectors doing there job not 1. Ive see some rotten food places including toilet blocks. To cover the whole area and do the job it would take at least 6 Inspectors to do so. So whos going to Pay for them??
Posted by All2Ezy, 11/03/2010 5:27:30 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
Governance comes at a cost. It's that simple. The question is whether charging the operators is the best way of recovering that cost. One could argue that we all benefit from healthy food outlets, so we should all be paying for it. It would be easy to say that the operators could pass costs on directly to customers, but we're already paying Sydney prices at these outlets. I reckon that maybe we should all be paying for these inspections through some other means. It's difficult with rate-pegging though, so I don't envy the Council.
Posted by gongman, 11/03/2010 7:24:19 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
It does seem pretty unfair for small business owner, and I feel sorry for them.
Posted by Simon, 11/03/2010 7:31:10 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Peter Campbell, petition in hand, with Cafe Burelli owner Terry Liu. Picture: ROBERT PEET
Peter Campbell, petition in hand, with Cafe Burelli owner Terry Liu. Picture: ROBERT PEET

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB43 plans 5%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 5%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 1%
5) Samsung Galaxy S14 plans 6%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Illawarra Mercury Drive


Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...