News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wollongong council $11.5 million in debt 

Wollongong council $11.5 million in debt

24 Oct, 2008 03:00 AM
Wollongong City Council's finances have continued to nosedive with an $11.5 million deficit announced for the past financial year.

Further service cuts are likely to improve the bottom line, but it still equates to a $153 loss for every Wollongong ratepayer.

If grants are included the deficit is about $3.2 million.

The situation is likely to get worse before it gets better, according to the council's annual report, details of which were released yesterday.

"A continued trend of deficit results means that over a period of time council will not be able to carry out its existing levels of service, and maintain and replace its assets ... at the time when they need to be replaced," the report said.

"Continual losses may indicate concern about council's ability to be financially viable in the longer term."

The deficit is the third highest over the past five years.

General manager David Farmer said he was not "planning" to seek a rate rise to address the problem.

"We are not planning on seeking a special rate variation for the upcoming year."

Yet according to the report, there are few options.

"Council's long-term sustainability (is in question) without a reduction in expenditure, increase in income, or both," the report said.

The figures come from a summary of the annual report document published on the council's website. The council's full annual report is due next month.

The consecutive deficits follow decades of under-investment in the region's infrastructure including roads, bridges, drainage, parks and buildings.

In September engineer and financial forecaster Professor Percy Allen said ratepayers would have a $1 billion infrastructure repair bill within 20 years if money wasn't found.

A set of five consecutive rate rises were aimed at addressing the issue, but the funds raised fell well short of what was needed.

Council efforts to turn finances around though are already bearing fruit with the deficit dropping from a reported $15 million deficit in April.

The council aims to cut its deficit to $4.4 million next year and by 2013 record a surplus of $2.4 million.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This just goes to show that the former general manager and certain councillors instead of being pro-developer, should have been pro-ratepayer. Where is our money from the past 20 years?
Posted by Alan Bond, 24/10/2008 6:29:11 AM
At least with Mr Farmer at the helm we know the real situation; we may not like it but at least it's there, in real terms, for us to address.
Posted by Obi, 24/10/2008 6:41:56 AM
i agree with Alan & Obi - the council needs to be pro-rate payer.

I hope that council continues to be open and transparent in all aspects, because only then can we hope to have any trust in the decisions they're making.

I see a long road ahead for Wollongong and I feel we're at least only now starting to head in the right direction.

Posted by frustrated, 24/10/2008 8:27:57 AM
Strewth! We have been aleep! Or has WCC been less than accountable? Personally I would prefer a rate rise to cutback of services - but I don't live in the northern suburbs where the rates go to four figures!
Posted by Fergie, 24/10/2008 10:04:33 AM
Fergie, I'm with you; bring on the rate rise because it's inevitable but show us some benefits for our money. And I think it's about time people started listening to Alan; he has been a voice of reason on WCC and its former leader's myopic approach to running our city.
Posted by Obi, 24/10/2008 1:04:40 PM
Who was the previous financial controller? surely he should have raised his concerns earlier?
Posted by dmb, 24/10/2008 1:06:25 PM
Just wondering is the Wollongong council exposed to Consolidated Debt Obligations or Sub Prime Loans? Many of the councils with problems like Gosford were very slow to publish their Audits for the year.
Posted by Edward James , 26/10/2008 1:24:06 AM
I think pro development would be good for Wollongong. This area needs development, which equals jobs for the area, I would think this is a priority.
Posted by gl, 27/10/2008 6:00:14 AM
There is a world wide financial crisis which is not the fault of WCC.

I would happily pay another $154 per year IF it put WCC back in the black AND if they stopped wasting ratepayers money on crap such as the alleged beatification of Belmore Basin.

All the locals wanted was a wider walking path and safer steps and railings and perhaps the reinstallation of the kiddie playground they pulled out a few years ago.

The Gateway project at Bulli Tops is another money-wasting extravaganza. Exactly whose fault is it?

Posted by Marc Simmons, 28/10/2008 8:25:47 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Wollongong City Council general manager David Farmer says rate rises are not on the agenda.
Wollongong City Council general manager David Farmer says rate rises are not on the agenda.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles




Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...