News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wollongong council slug on ratepayers: $77 

Wollongong council slug on ratepayers: $77

22 Apr, 2010 03:18 AM
Wollongong ratepayers will shell out an average $77 extra next year as the city embarks on a renovation blitz of its ageing infrastructure.

Wollongong City Council's draft management plan released yesterday reveals it will splash out $70 million on capital works over the next year, much of it to redress decades of underspending on infrastructure and to spruce up the city's assets.

To help fund the work, average rates will rise by $26 to $1068 - in line with the State Government's rate pegging limit.

Ratepayers will also pay an extra $51 a year on average for domestic waste, to cover rapidly rising landfill costs.

The increase brings the annual cost of a household's 120-litre waste bin to $340.

Renewal of the city's deteriorating footpaths, roads, civic buildings and playgrounds will be the new focus, as city officials scramble to preserve the city's major assets.

Many were constructed in the post-World War II building boom and are crying out for upgrade and replacement.

Even the city's 730km of stormwater drains will receive a makeover.

The council's general manager David Farmer said the plan would allow for rejuvenation of the city's most crucial assets.

"It's a continuation of what we've been doing the last few years, of reducing costs and reinvesting in infrastructure, the things people use every day," he said.

The plan shows that while the council's budget is in surplus, the depreciation of its $3 billion worth of ageing assets has created a $22.5 million funding shortfall.

The capital works will extend to key projects including work on Crown St Mall and the Blue Mile, the Wollongong Town Hall refurbishment and the relocation of Warrawong Library.

Mr Farmer said funds would also be directed to the West Dapto Access Strategy, including a $26 million interest-free State Government loan.

"The big investment in road infrastructure in West Dapto sets the scene for development and will assist in unlocking a significant amount of employment lands to assist growth of our port," Mr Farmer said.

The council has trimmed the fat from its internal operations to help fund the capital works, cutting $11.8 million from its operating expenses over the past two years by increasing efficiency and reducing staff costs.

Other projects include the preparation of town centre plans and a reduction in development application turnaround times.

The draft management plan is expected to be placed on public exhibition after next Tuesday's council meeting.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It is hard to believe that even an incompetent Council 5 to 10 years ago did nothing to address the aging infrastucture issue even then. If they didn't then where did our rate dollars go? There have only been two new major expenditures in the last few years, The Thirroul Library and anxillary development and the Dapto Ribbonwood Development and they had State funding to assist in the costs. Why is it that incompetence in Local Government is still allowed to thrive by the State Government? Farmer has stated that he has slashed over $11million in operating costs, that is less staff, that means , we the ratepayers are again short changed on services that we pay for. Staff are stressed as the workload has increased to unacceptable levels and morale amongst the staff is very low, creating staff shortages due to stress leave, sick leave and a general desire not to go to work in such unpleasant surroundings. Time we had a major review of the management structure to reduce the costs, as managers there do not produce anything of value and are a burden on the ratepayers.
Posted by johne, 22/04/2010 5:04:21 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Well, I don't mind a small rate increase like this one - especially if they get around to resurfacing my street, which has patches on patches where potholes have been filled in at each end. It's the hefty ones [like a $300 rise in one year in the early 1990's] that people on fixed/low incomes can't possibly budget for that change the face of suburbs.
Posted by Fergie, 22/04/2010 6:17:30 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Hang on a minute. I thought the parking meters were suposed to be for road and footpath improvements?
Posted by CouncilStinks, 22/04/2010 7:27:14 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
But what about all the 37 million they have invested according to their Financial Statement for February 2010? So where is it, well, from the Financial Report as of 28 February 2010, with half dropping in value (lookup Statement of Investments on WCC web site) this is it; St. George Bank$120,000.00 CBA Business On-line Saver$4,922,000.00 Commonwealth Bank Australia zero coupon bond with a $4M face value$2,000,000.00 ASHWELL 2006-5A$2,000,820.00 ANZ$990,350.00 Adelaide Airport - New Terminal Finance$2,000,000.00 Westpac $998,460.00 Members Equity Bank$1,000,000.00 Commonwealth Bank Australia (Government Guaranteed)$1,000,000.00 EMERALD A Mortgage Backed Security $1,000,000.00 EMERALD B Mortgage Backed Security$2,000,000.00 Suncorp Sales & Services Vic$1,000,000.00 IMB $3,000,000.00 Citibank Pty Ltd $2,000,000.00 Westpac Banking Corp$3,000,000.00 Newcastle Permanent $3,000,000.00 Citibank Pty Ltd$3,000,000.00 Suncorp Sales & Services Vic$3,000,000.00 Suncorp Sales & Services Vic$1,000,000.00 Managed FundsTcorp Long Term Growth Facility Trust $1,131,841.44 Southern Phone Company$2.00 (yes, 2 bucks)
Posted by Alan Bond, 22/04/2010 7:48:45 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
$37 Million - $22.5 Million still leaves a balance of $14.5 Million with no need for any rate rise.
Posted by CC, 22/04/2010 8:33:14 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Don't knock the $2 investment in Southern Phone, Alan. It's the best performing investment (percentage-wise) in council's investment portfolio. The returns on that $2 have been pretty good - well into the $1,000!
Posted by stirrer, 22/04/2010 8:47:55 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
The ones running council for the ten years prior to getting the administrators forced upon us, were more interested in pandering to the developers, than worrying about looking after the ratepayer. How many trips were taken to look at infrastructure and the like, with no benifit
Posted by bushie, 22/04/2010 9:26:00 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Not sure why Wollongong should have investments when sticking hand out for more money. I would understand some cash reserves for unexpected expenses like sudden visit of very important politician or some emergency repairs. But what would I know?
Posted by Barry, 22/04/2010 10:25:07 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Without the interest earned from these investments Barry all us Wollongong ratepayers & residents would be shelling out a truckload more in rates (or rents) every year. I am sure most folk would rather such resrves earning the city cash than trying to find more rates or rents from already stretched household budgets.
Posted by Trapper, 22/04/2010 10:48:51 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Sorry, not enough room enabled me to say that the $2.00 shown as invested in Southern Phone is now zero!!! That's a 100% loss!
Posted by Alan Bond, 22/04/2010 2:10:24 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Is Wollongong City Council's $77 rate rise justified?

Yes
(22.4%)

No
(77.6%)

Total Votes: 344
Poll Date: 22 April, 2010

Most popular articles




Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...