News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wollongong gets poor green rating 

Wollongong gets poor green rating

15 Jun, 2010 04:00 AM
Wollongong is the worst ranked of all Australian cities when it comes to coping with emerging environmental pressures such as climate change, a national report has revealed.

The Australian Conservation Foundation's Sustainable Cities Index, which measured the eco-credentials of the nation's 20 largest cities across 15 indicators, found Wollongong was Australia's least "resilient" city - the most likely to falter under major environmental stress.

The unflattering result was due to a low education rate, comparably poor public health, a scarcity of volunteers and a lack of local food production, the index showed.

Just 35 per cent of people aged over 20 have completed Year 12 or equivalent, and almost 7 per cent of the city's population suffers Type 2 diabetes.

High levels of household loan repayments also contributed to the result.

In terms of overall sustainability, Darwin was ranked No 1.

Wollongong placed 17th, ahead of Newcastle, Geelong and Perth.

Australian Conservation Foundation spokeswoman Monica Richter said a sense of community would help cities stay resilient in the face of threats such as global warming or a peak oil crisis.

"A city with a strong sense of community, volunteering and more places for local food production is better placed to deal with future challenges, by giving people a sense of strong, cohesive community around them," she said.

"Wollongong has some way to go - it is doing very well in some areas and poorly in others."

The city also ranked worst in air quality, measuring 2.5 times more particulate matter per cubic metre of air than the best performing city, the Sunshine Coast.

But Wollongong scored well in water usage, low rates of private car ownership and climate change policies put in place by local government.

Cunningham MP Sharon Bird questioned the pessimistic snapshot.

"I very much dispute the argument that somehow there is a major problem in our region that makes it a negative overall - it's sad to rank in a way that insinuates the bottom cities are not going well," Ms Bird said.

Conceding youth unemployment and school retention rates were problematic, the Wollongong community boasted a "very deep sense of the need to look after each other", she said.

Cunningham Greens candidate George Takacs said while Wollongong may have low rates of private car ownership, public transport did not make up the shortfall. He was also concerned about the Illawarra's hunger for new housing areas, claiming it was eating up valuable agricultural land.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What do expect when you have steelworks, coal mines, heavy industrial traffic and developers trying to open up protected areas? There is no local food production. But then it's like conducting a survey of cities in a desert, and the Illawarra would be on the bottom of that list!
Posted by Tracka, 15/06/2010 8:11:18 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
i knew there was a reason i moved away from this hole. this is just one of many!!
Posted by shard78, 15/06/2010 8:44:48 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
I am so shocked. How can this be in the City of Innovation? Maybe because our Council don't have the foggiest idea about sustainability - think Calderwood, think Tallawarra!
Posted by m@RV, 15/06/2010 9:03:38 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
Sounds like a road of rubbish to me. Of course Wollongong area does poorly, there is the steelworks, the coal mining and the port with all its car carrier trucks carrying them back to Sydney where the ship used to unload them. How about leaving out the major industry and providing a more accurate survey of residential areas only?
Posted by Joelm, 15/06/2010 10:10:02 AM, on Illawarra Mercury
I agree with George Takacs, Wollongong is defined into the coastal strip by the escarpment. It is the longest 'strip' city in the world, with volcanic soils and all the rain the rest of Australia doesn't get. Strange how the Property Council is always talking about shortage of land release, but developers can't sell the land they are already offering. Best to keep the current land for food production, and if you do allow new apartment blocks to be built, force them to be rentcontrolled at 75% market value. It is well known overseas that the market is not allowed to deflate prices in Australia, as lobbyists work hard to keep prices artificially high.
Posted by Mark from Kiama, 15/06/2010 1:44:48 PM, on Illawarra Mercury
Like the local politicians who slammed the report and leapt to Wollongong's defence, we would be better served in rading the report on the ACF site, and acting on it. What peturbed me was: ""The unflattering result was due to a low education rate, comparably poor public health, a scarcity of volunteers and a lack of local food production, the index showed. ""Just 35 per cent of people aged over 20 have completed Year 12 or equivalent, and almost 7 per cent of the city's population suffers Type 2 diabetes."" Let's do better for the up and coming generations still at school, which trying to improve the present situation.
Posted by Fergie, 16/06/2010 8:30:47 AM, on Illawarra Mercury

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Wollongong is poorly rated as a sustainable city.
Wollongong is poorly rated as a sustainable city.

Most popular articles




Illawarra Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...