News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wollongong residents win fight against urban plans 

Wollongong residents win fight against urban plans

27 May, 2009 10:02 AM
Wollongong City Council administrator Gabrielle Kibble has vowed to fight to keep medium-density development away from Woonona and North Wollongong railway stations.

Administrators last night voted in favour of reduced height limits for residential areas and an amended proposal for medium-density development around railway stations.

The recommendations were among those contained in the first of three reports on the draft Wollongong Local Environmental Plan.

  • Administrators seek feedback on future plans

  • Open letter from Wollongong's administrators to the community

    A number of speakers congratulated the council for listening to vocal community opposition to height and density issues in the city.

    In response to 439 objections to the height limits, the 16m limit in medium-density zones was reduced to 13m (three storeys).

    Low-density residential zones will have a 9m height limit (two storeys) rather than the proposed 11m.

    There was also relief at the decision to abandon medium-density development around Woonona railway station and west of North Wollongong railway station.

    Former independent councillor Alice Cartan welcomed the change, but she was concerned about what the NSW Department of Planning would say about the council abandoning "urban consolidation" principles near the two stations.

    Mrs Kibble reassured her that: "When the council adopts the plan in its final form, we will sure as hell fight for it."

    Port Kembla stalwart Olive Rodwell thanked the administrators and council staff for finally listening to Port Kembla residents.

    "We have not had honest representation in Port Kembla for many years," she said.

    She welcomed news the old Port Kembla school would be zoned for mixed use, rather than industrial use, and that the new school would retain a green buffer from heavy industry.

    Mrs Kibble last night amended the proposal for the former Port Kembla school site to limit residential development to south of the remaining school buildings.

    She said the changes to the LEP were a direct result of community feedback.

  • Print
    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size

    comments


    Date: Newest first | Oldest first
    Now if they can only keep the current 7d Hacking River Catchment zone as is, when the new zoning of E2 - Environmental Conservation comes in to replace it, generations of people will appreciate the saving of the Hacking River Catchment away from land speculators, unscrupulous developers, etc. So will the native animals who can not speak for themselves because this is their Wildlife Corridor from the National Heritage Listed Garrawarra State Conservation Area and the Royal National Park to the unique Illawarra Escarpment, regarded as NSW's own Kakadu. However, fair compensation should be paid to those landowners who apply to sell back, if they wish, to the authorities.
    Posted by Alan Bond, 27/05/2009 7:37:46 AM
    Another day of the week and yet one more decision by the Administrators and David Farmer that demonstrates their competence and professionalism.

    I see from other postings that Alan Bond - that constant critic of Council - is now also regularly moved to say positive, supportive things about the Administrators.

    So too one of the Councillors who was on the Council dismissed in 2008. Lets face facts - we have oodles of community consultation with the Administrators - tonnes more than we ever got under any elected Councillors.

    They are actually listening to what the community wants and amending the Draft LEP in response.

    That is also more than we ever got under elected Councils.

    Now Ms Kibble also says she is also prepared to fight to defend the LEP against state government interference. More gold stars.

    Posted by More Administrator Gold Stars, 27/05/2009 7:50:54 AM
    So where are all those people claiming to want democracy in Wollongong ? I suggest this community is getting more genuine consuitation and fair, credible decision making from the Administrators than we ever had under elected Councillors.

    This is yet another example


    Posted by Excellent decision by Kibble, 27/05/2009 7:58:55 AM
    Less than 80 people out of 120,000 voters in attendance ...the need for dramatic change was clearly desperate. The impact of Administration is about more than the so claimed "successful" LEP amendments - which are mostly driven by self interest!
    Posted by Shaun Prince, 27/05/2009 1:42:05 PM
    When we had an ALP dominated council, poor decision making was a daily occurrence. But contrast that with the GENUINE consultation and democratic process that is now taking place for the first time in Wollongong in several decades, and we begin to see just how bad the former council was.
    Posted by Ted, 27/05/2009 2:02:43 PM
    For legal reasons the Mercury edits online comments where sweeping allegations of corruption are made. The ICAC made 24 corrupt conduct findings against 10 people. To date no one has been prosecuted.
    Posted on 27/05/2009 2:53:03 PM
    If good decisions by the State appointed administrators are considered to be better than a healthy democractic process, what next? A single Adminstrator to replace the State government? A single Adminstrator to replace the Federal government? We know where that concentration of power leads. What is required is empowerment of our communities by way of Ward based precinct committees - and elected Councillors.
    Posted by Bruce of Coledale, 27/05/2009 6:58:08 PM
    To clarify my stance described as constant critic of Council. It was the former Council that I asked questions about. The current Council of administrators and David Farmer's management I certainly have no problem with as they are demonstrating their decisions and actions quite well. Yes, I too, wonder about these people wanting elected Councillors etc before decisions are made, particularly on the Draft LEP 2009. Where are their arguments now? Most people didn't need to go to the these final meetings with Council. Enough submissions had gone in to point out views. With Megan Levy's comment, the Mercury should be campaigning when the prosecutions will be carried out.
    Posted by Alan Bond, 28/05/2009 7:16:50 AM
    If we fail to save appropriate lands for medium density living, we stifle population growth. Lands near railway stations are ideal for this and yes, the Dept of Planning knows that urban consolidation is good planning. Where are the greenies on this? Low density living uses more land and resources and forces residents to drive their cars everywhere. Why aren't we supporting medium density living near transport hubs? Populist decision making does not help us.
    Posted by BJ, 28/05/2009 10:43:06 AM
    The Administrators are doing the best job in Wollongong - far better than any elected Councillors ever did. I say lets keep them permanantly!
    Posted by Administrators Forever please, 30/05/2009 1:18:45 PM
    I agree with BJ's comments. We need more housing for the increasing population and rail stations are the most logical spot to include medium density zones. Just because the local residents, and I mean the ones that actually live there as opposed to people from say Stanwell Park for example, oppose this it shouldn't stop sensible town planning decisions. We are not talking about knocking down their homes today, we are talking about changing the zoning so it is more in line with the future needs of the area. Otherwise developers will need to look at other greenfield sites that may have more of an environmental impact than inner suburbia. If you go back far enough we all are living on what used to be a greenfield site...
    Posted by get real, 2/06/2009 11:15:10 AM

    post a comment


    Screen name  *
    Email address  *
    Remember me?
    Comment  *
     
    We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
    Administrators and council executives listen to public members yesterday. Picture: ANDY ZAKELI
    Administrators and council executives listen to public members yesterday. Picture: ANDY ZAKELI

    Most popular articles




    Illawarra Mercury







    Weather brought to you by:

    Weatherzone

    Classifieds

    Front Page

    Current Issue
    Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
     SEND...
     SAVE...
     SHARE...