A passenger on an airliner becomes belligerent, drunk, noncompliant with rules, or has some sort of emotional outburst. At its most innocuous, it's unpleasant. At its worst, flight attendants and passengers have been threatened or injured.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Researchers recently studied more than 1000 air rage incidents over the course of nearly a million flights. They looked for predictors of bad behaviour. How far seats tilted back, impinging on the space of a fellow passenger, wasn't a predictor. Smaller seats, flight delays and longer flight durations all increased the incidence of air rage. After controlling for these factors, the authors also found two other major predictors.
First, if a plane had a first class section, the incidence of air rage more than tripled among economy passengers. Second, if economy passengers have to walk through first class to get to their seats, rather than entering mid-plane, it causes an even higher incidence of air rage.
The findings make sense. Being a socioeconomic have-not is bad for your health. It increases the odds of major depression and the likelihood of anti-social or criminal behaviour. An even bigger predictor of those bad outcomes is the noticeable magnitude of socioeconomic inequality - how much the have-nots' noses are rubbed in their bad fortune as they scurry through life's equivalents of the first class section on an airplane. More than poverty, it's poverty amid plenty that enrages us.
Logic would indicate that air rage in economy ought to consist of someone in a frothing state sprinting up the aisle into first class and berating the well to do. Instead, the frothing passenger is a jerk to the poor flight attendant who has no choice but to absorb it. It's the same with primates displacing aggression: When the going gets tough the obnoxious tend to pick on someone weaker.
