Sydney law graduate argues English skills too poor to sit on a jury

By Michaela Whitbourn
Updated August 16 2017 - 12:54pm, first published August 15 2017 - 4:30pm

A Sydney law graduate who argued his command of the English language was too limited to be a juror was knocked back by the Supreme Court and ordered to continue deliberations in a murder trial, according to a judgment published after the guilty verdict.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Get the latest Wollongong news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.