But what does it actually mean, and why is it important? What will it take to achieve it, and are we on track? And what has Glasgow got to do with it?

Frank Jotzo, the director of Australian National University's Centre for Climate and Energy Policy, has helped answer some of the questions at the heart of this debate.

Net zero is shorthand for net zero emissions, which refers to the balance between the amount of greenhouse gas produced and the amount removed from the atmosphere.

If and when we reach net zero, it won't mean there are no greenhouse gases.

Prof Jotzo says that while it was possible to replace fossil fuels such as coal, gas and oil with clean alternatives, there were some sources of emissions which would be around for a "very long time, perhaps forever".

Read more: Climate change is a health hazard, says UOW academic

To compensate for those emissions - to reach net zero - carbon dioxide has to be actively removed from the atmosphere. That can be achieved in a number of ways, including planting new forests or literally capturing carbon dioxide through a mechanism known as direct air capture.

Australia, with its vast open spaces and rich energy resources, is "incredibly well placed" to be able remove large quantities of carbon from the atmosphere, Prof Jotzo says.

The science could not be more definitive on the link between greenhouse gas emissions and global temperature increase.

The recent UN Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change found that greenhouse gas emissions from human activities were responsible for 1.1 degree of global temperature rise since 1850, with the crucial 1.5-degree threshold at risk of being breached in the early 2030s without rapid and urgent action.

That rise brings with it an increasing risk of longer heatwaves, more frequent droughts, rising sea levels and extreme weather events such as bushfires.

The IPCC report warned that the 2-degree threshold - which would see even more catastrophic consequences - could be reached within two decades, and temperatures could hit 5.7 degrees by 2100 if pollution levels remained high.

"Fundamentally, if we are to arrest global warming then we need to stop the net addition of greehouse gases into the atmosphere," Prof Jotzo says.

The global push for stronger and urgent climate action has never had such momentum.

World leaders (with some notable exceptions) will later this month converge on the Scottish city of Glasgow for the UN Climate Change Conference, or COP26. The conference has four goals, starting with aiming of securing agreement on reaching carbon neutrality by mid-century.

Countries are being asked to bring forward "ambitious" 2030 emissions reduction targets which align with the net zero goal.

Australia is under pressure to both set a 2050 target and lift its 2030 aim, which at 26-28 per cent below 2005 levels is far lower than other countries.

The US plans to halve emissions by the end of the decade, while Boris Johnson's UK government wants to reduce emissions 68 per cent below 1990 levels by 2030.

Energy and Emissions Reduction Minister Angus Taylor says Australia is on track to meet and beat its 2030 target, which was set under former prime minister Tony Abbott.

The latest figures show Australia's emissions fallen almost 21 per cent on 2005 levels, on the back of what Mr Taylor describes as the nation's world-leading take up of wind and solar.

But while the headline number might suggest Australia is well on its way, Prof Jotzo says it doesn't tell the full story.

He says the government's own figures show that the entirety of emissions reductions achieved since 2005 have come from land use and forestry. Take out that sector and total emissions are higher than they were 16 years ago.

Prof Jotzo says the government can no longer rely on land use, meaning emissions will need to be cut in transport, industry, agriculture and electricity in order to reduce Australia's carbon footprint.

The federal government will release a long-term emissions reduction strategy ahead of Glasgow, which will position technology as key to reaching carbon neutrality. It could include a net zero by 2050 target - if the Nationals can be convinced.

The states and territories are already stepping up to the plate. The NSW Coalition government and Victorian Labor government have both committing to halving emissions by 2030.

While more than 100 countries have updated their Paris targets amid a concerted global climate action push, the planet's emissions remain on a worrying trajectory.

A recent UN report showed the policies of all parties to the Paris Agreement would result in a 16 per cent increase in emissions by 2030, compared to 2010 levels.

UN Climate Change executive secretary Patricia Espinosa said the projection was a "huge cause for concern".

Electrification.

The "ultimate" net zero system is, according to Prof Jotzo, one in which renewable electricity provides the bulk of energy to the economy.

For applications which have traditionally relied on coal, oil or gas, electricity would be used instead. Think electric cars, for instance.

Electricity can also be used to make hydrogen, a resource Prof Jotzo says could eventually replace iron ore and coking coal for steel production - currently responsible for about eight per cent of global carbon emissions.

That percentage might seem small now, but Prof Jotzo notes that once the electricity and transport sectors are decarbonised it will make up a large chunk of what is left.

The Illawarra Mercury news app is now officially live on both iOS and Android devices. It is available for download in the Apple Store and Google Play.