Pool fence fracas

By Mario Christodoulou
Updated November 6 2012 - 3:00am, first published December 30 2011 - 8:51am
Wollongong City Council has threatened Mangerton grandfather Peter Abba with a $1.1 million fine after accusing him of having an unsafe pool
Wollongong City Council has threatened Mangerton grandfather Peter Abba with a $1.1 million fine after accusing him of having an unsafe pool

Wollongong City Council has threatened Mangerton grandfather Peter Abba with a $1.1 million fine after accusing him of having an unsafe pool, despite it being surrounded by a 1.5m fence with two locked gates.Earlier this week, a Stanwell Tops family went public with their own threat from council - a $1.1million fine if their cubby house was not pulled down.Mr Abba, a pharmacist, thought he was doing the right thing when he responded to a request from council to inspect his home in Mangerton in November 2010. But what followed was an expensive battle over the safety of a pool, which would have required a toddler to break through two security gates and scale a 1.5m brush fence to enter.He was later told the fence was a fire hazard, despite it being hemmed in by towering gum trees and a nearby highly combustible turpentine, with which the council took no issue.Mr Abba said he spent about $4000 commissioning planning reports to fight the charge and replacing the surface of the brush fence with a thin veneer."This is absolute bureaucracy gone mad," he said."Anybody being aware of the situation and looking at the scene would have to understand how frustrated I was."A council spokesman said he "rejects the allegation of harassment"."Council has a duty to ensure that all pool owners comply with the swimming pool [legislation]," he said."The fines outlined in the letter to the resident are applied by the courts if there is a case, not by council."Mr Abba said he had gone to great lengths to make his pool safe after his granddaughter was left critically ill after a horrific poolside accident in 2003.His fence ranges in height from 1.5 to 1.8m, well above the 1.2m legal minimum height. Despite this Mr Abba said he was told the fence was still dangerous because toddlers could clamber over it, gaining purchase on the embedded fastening wires.He decided to fight the claim and commissioned a planning consultant to review the council's ruling. The consultant, JBA Planning's Terry Wetherall, found the pool fence was within planning requirements.When Mr Abba told council about the finding, he was informed the fence would have to come down anyway because it was a fire hazard."The response by the council officer was quite simply, 'I have your report, I don't agree with it, but it doesn't matter because your pool fence is a bushfire hazard ... we will send you an order and you will have to remove your fence within a period of time otherwise you will be fined $1.1 million," Mr Abba said.He said Wollongong City Council eventually dropped the matter but not before he had spent several thousands of dollars fighting the order.Mr Abba said he felt compelled to come forward after reading the story of the owners of the Tumbling Waters retreat at Stanwell Tops - Sonja Keller and husband Andrew Bergmann - who were also threatened with a $1.1 million dollar fine for building a cubby house for their son Yaan. Council is reviewing the cubby house situation.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Get the latest Wollongong news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.