Brittany Higgins could face fresh defamation allegation

The former defence minister, who plans to retire from politics at the next election, is suing Ms Higgins over social media posts she says have damaged her reputation.

During a hearing for the high-profile case in the WA Supreme Court on Friday, Senator Reynolds' legal team said Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz debated who should publish her fiance's now-deleted tweet based on the number of social media followers each had.

"There was a discussion - whose Twitter account was the better one to post on," Senator Reynolds' lawyer, Martin Bennett, told reporters outside court.

"That indicates that they weren't acting independently of each other and we say to the court, that's the argument that we want to advance."

Mr Bennett said Senator Reynolds would ask the court's permission to amend her claim against Ms Higgins to include the tweet from January 2023 on the basis that she was also a publisher.

Senator Reynolds' legal team also raised concerns about the "significant shift" in Ms Higgins' defence, which has been amended.

Mr Bennett said there were paragraphs about "justification of contextual truth" that he could not understand.

"For example ... it said that Senator Reynolds asking (her then chief of staff Fiona Brown) to lodge a complaint with the police was a mishandling of the rape allegation," he said.

Mr Bennett said he would consider applying to the court to strike out the paragraphs.

The court also heard Mr Sharaz had consented to judgment after tweeting in April that he would no longer fight Senator Reynolds' allegation that he had also defamed her in a series of social media posts.

The order required Mr Sharaz to delete three tweets, a Facebook post and an Instagram story from 2022 and 2023, which his lawyers said had been done.

The damages Mr Sharaz will have to pay following his admission will be decided after Ms Higgins' defamation trial later in the year.

Australian Associated Press